Environmental justice about People and Communities
Environmental justice embodies the principles that communities and populations should not be disproportionately exposed to adverse environmental impacts. Environmental justice is that the all fair treatment and ver much meaningful involvement of all people, there is no matter race, color, national origin, or income, with reference to the event, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies. This goal is achieved when everyone enjoys it. It is the principle that all people have the right to equal environmental protection, regardless of race, color, or national origin. It is the right to live, work, and play in a clean environment.
The concept of environmental justice started as a movement in the 1980s due to the awareness that a disproportionate number of polluting industries, power plants, and waste disposal areas were located near low-income or minority communities. Historically, Pennsylvania and low-income minorities and people have been forced to bear a disproportionate share of the negative environmental impact. It is our duty to ensure that all Pennsylvania residents, especially those who are not usually entitled, are meaningfully involved in decisions affecting their environment and that all communities are not wrongfully and/or disproportionately burdened with adverse environmental impacts. Simply put, environmental law ensures that everyone has an equal seat at the table.
Poor air quality due to a nearby oil-drilling site. Poisoned drinking water from a chemical plant in the area. Homes with low income located in a floodplain. These are examples of what people refer to when they talk about environmental justice. the same degree of protection against environmental and health risks and equal access to the decision-making process to possess a healthy environment during which to measure, learn, and work.
Fair treatment means no group should bear a disproportionate share of the negative environmental impact of commercial, government, and commercial activities or policies. The movement is designed to ensure a fair distribution of the environmental burden to all people, regardless of their background.
Meaningful engagement means:
- People have the opportunity to participate in decisions about activities that can affect their environment and/or health;
- The public contribution can influence the decision of the supervisor;
- Community concerns are taken into account in decision-making; and
- Decision-makers will seek out and facilitate those involved.
More Definition of Environmental Justice
Although the origins of the environmental justice movement can be traced back to the adoption of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Robert Bullard’s work entitled Dumping in Dixie, published in the 1990s, is considered the first book on the reality of environmental injustice. The work examines the growing economic, health, and environmental differences between racial and socioeconomic groups in the late twentieth and early twenty-first century.
Read also about World Environment Day
Bullard states that when writing the book he assumed that all Americans have the basic right to live, work, play, go to school, and worship in a clean and healthy environment (DD, xii). Bullard’s analysis in Dumping in Dixie “describes the emergence of the environmental justice movement in an effort to develop common strategies that support the construction of sustainable African American communities and people of color communities.
Environmental justice is that the very essential peer-reviewed journal would do well to investigate the simplest fair treatment of all people, especially for minorities and low-income people, in case of implementation, and more enforcement of environmental laws, – regulations and policies. Published bimonthly, Environmental Justice addresses the adverse and disparate health and environmental impacts affecting marginalized populations around the world. The Journal facilitates an open dialogue between the many stakeholders involved in the fight for environmental justice: communities, industry, science, government, and non-profit organizations.
Environmental Justice coverage includes:
Environmental justice is a critical part of the fight to improve and maintain a clean and healthy environment, especially for those who traditionally live, work, and play closest to the sources of pollution.
Read also about Environmental Issues
Environmental justice always obliges the proper to the ethical, balanced, and responsible use of land and renewable resources within the real interest of a sustainable planet for humans and other living things. Environmental justice is for peace and it requires all universal protection against all nuclear testing, production, extraction, and disposal of toxic/hazardous waste and poisons, and nuclear testing that threatens the basic right to wash air, land, water, and food. Environmental justice affirms the basic right to political, economic, cultural, and environmental self-determination of all peoples.
In particular, environmental justice requires the cessation of production of all toxins, hazardous waste, and radioactive materials, which all past and current producers are held accountable to humans for detoxification and containment at the point of production. Environmental justice always requires the proper to participate as equal partners at any level of proper decision-making, including needs analysis, planning, implementation, enforcement, and evaluation. Environmental justice confirms the suitability of all types of workers for a safe and healthy working environment, without being forced to settle for unsafe livelihoods and unemployment. It also reaffirms the right of home workers to be free from environmental threats.
Environmental justice refers to those cultural norms, values, rules, regulations, behaviors, policies, and decisions that support sustainability, where all people can trust that their community and natural environment is safe and productive. Environmental Justice is realized when all people can realize their highest potential, without interruption from racism or environmental inequality. Environmental justice is typically supported by properly paid and safe jobs; quality schools and recreation; decent housing and adequate health care; democratic decision-making; and ultimately personal empowerment. A community of environmental justice is one that respects both cultural and biological diversity, where there is equal access to institutions and there are sufficient resources to grow and prosper.
Environmental justice protects the rights of victims of environmental injustice to receive full compensation and reparations, as well as quality healthcare. Environmental justice considers public acts of environmental injustice to be a violation of the law of nations, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and therefore the UN Convention on Genocide. Environmental justice always recognizes a special legal and natural relationship of indigenous peoples with the United States government through conventions, treaties, and covenants affirming sovereignty and self-determination.
Read also about Environmental Technology and Innovation
Environmental justice confirms the need for urban and rural environmental policies to scrub and rebuild our cities and rural areas consonant with nature, honoring the cultural integrity of all our communities and giving everyone fair access to the full range of resources. Environmental justice calls for strict adherence to the principles of informed consent and for the cessation of testing experimental reproductive and medical procedures and vaccinations in humans of color.
Environmental justice is against the destructive operations of multinational companies. Environmental justice resists military occupation, oppression, and exploitation of land, peoples, and cultures, and other life forms. Environmental justice must require quality education from current and future generations, moreover emphasizing social and environmental issues, supported our experience and appreciation for our diverse cultural perspectives.
Environmental justice must require that we, as individuals, make good personal and consumer choices to consume as little of Mother Earth’s resources as much possible and to provide as little waste as possible and make the conscious decision to challenge our lifestyle and give it a new priority to ensure the health of the natural world for present and future generations.
Environmental racism and environmental justice
Environmental justice advocates argue that there is an intimate relationship between the trilogy of ecological racism, environmental discrimination, and environmental policy-making. Environmental injustice and racism have their roots in a political-institutional context focused on discrimination. Municipal, state, and federal regulations, therefore, aim to allow, approve, and even promote ecological racism.
In addition, advocates for environmental justice claim that government policies are also aimed at targeting color communities for toxic waste disposal and also at establishing polluting industries in those communities. In addition, policies and laws not only allow for but officially endorse, official sanctions against life-threatening toxins and pollutants found in color communities.
Environmental justice advocates also argue that residents of victims’ groups are excluded from access to political power and, therefore, excluded from providing services to decision-making councils and regulators, thereby subtly but deliberately promoting environmental injustice and racism. Each of these elements contributes to the existence and dissemination of injustice and racism in the environment.
Environmental justice advocates claim, Experiences of environmental racism and injustice are neither arbitrary nor individual. Consequently, the environmental justice movement is concerned with these two issues, socialism, and perceived intentionality. On the one hand, advocates for environmental justice argue for environmental injustice as it happens with groups; and on the other hand, advocates of environmental justice are also concerned about the systemic causes of environmental injustice.
Causes of environmental injustice
Environmental injustice occurs when members of an injured ethnos or other groups suffer disproportionately at the local, regional (sub-national) or national level because of environmental risks or threats or violations of fundamental human rights due to environmental factors. In addition, environmental injustice occurs when an individual or group of individuals is denied access to environmental investments, benefits, and natural resources.
In addition, environmental injustice occurs when individuals or collective groups are denied access to information and / or participation in decision-making, as well as access to justice in environmental matters. The task of the study of environmental injustice is to investigate the power hierarchies inherent in a particular socio-cultural context and the way in which those hierarchies not only tolerate but also spread environmental injustice against a number of disadvantaged populations.
Institutionalized racism is a cause of environmental injustice. Institutionalized racism is defined as the practical reality of purposefully and intentionally targeting neighborhoods and communities made up of a majority of people of low socioeconomic status and a collective group of individuals of color and is considered the natural outgrowth of racism.
According to environmental justice advocates, this racism has become acculturated and established in contemporary social institutions, not least a governmental bureaucracy at municipal, state, and federal levels that not only allows but also reinforces the imposition of environmental injustice on these groups. Bunyan Bryant describes ecological racism as the systematic exclusion of colored people from environmental decisions affecting their communities.
Status in Life
Another factor that leads to the reality of environmental injustice is the commercialization of land, water, energy, and air. This has meant that they are secured and protected on behalf of those who have power over those who have no power. Advocates of environmental justice recall that regardless of our status in life, we all exist collectively within the context of this biosphere. Therefore, we breathe an equivalent air, we share an equivalent atmosphere with an equivalent ozonosphere and climate patterns, we eat food from an equivalent soil and seas, and we harvest the same acid rain.
In addition, the unresponsive and irresponsible government policies and regulations that exist at all levels of government contribute to racism and injustice to the environment. Public authorities often fail to respond to community needs regarding environmental inequalities due to the existence of an oppressive power structure. Moreover, the availability of government to powerful companies that exercise power for self-interest also poses problems. Consequently, victims of environmental injustice find it difficult, if not impossible, to use public resources and power to advance their cause.
Lack of Financial Resources
In addition, the lack of resources and power in the affected communities is a major contributor to the presence of racism in the environment. In addition to the previous obstacles, the common denominator of powerlessness on the part of the victims is the lack of financial resources to invest in the fight for environmental justice and also the lack of power of the victims of environmental injustice. In particular, groups adversely affected by environmental inequalities do not lack the capacity to function as an organized bloc defending their interests against those struggling for authority and prosperity.
Finally, a fragmented regulatory approach that allows loopholes and the consequently continued victimization of low-income populations contributes to the reality of environmental racism. The ongoing process of government regulation also poses a problem in combating environmental injustice and the implementation of environmental justice. The resulting gaps between pieces of legislation adopted in an attempt to combat environmental injustice often provide a context for circumventing the intent of this legislation.
How can I help the environmental justice movement?
Community groups around the world play an important role in leading efforts to achieve environmental justice. These groups identify local problems and mobilize local action. However, any individual can also have an impact by participating in the fight against ecological racism and working on environmental justice for all.
Here are a few ideas:
Be an informed voter
Take a position on environmental racism by examining candidates’ views on environmental protection and supporting those who want to protect the environment for all, regardless of race or economic status. A useful site to start is usa.gov/voter-research.
Supporting local community organizations in environmental justice
Consider spending your time, talents, and wallet to help local community groups defend environmental justice. A good place to start your search is voluntigermatch.org.
Keep up to date with environmental law
Visit ejatlas.org and learn about environmental justice case studies currently taking place around the world.
Give children the opportunity to breathe
Another way to make a difference is by supporting IQAir’s Clean Air for Kids. Poor air quality in the classroom affects student health and can affect academic performance and average daily attendance. Clean Air for Kids offers air filtration to schools in areas disproportionately affected by air pollution.
Tell your representatives how you feel
US citizens can go to countable.us to find out which bills go through the House and Senate. On the site, you can quickly contact your representatives to tell them how you feel about each piece of legislation.
Become part of the solution
Buy less, consume less, and shop consciously. Buy products that are made responsibly and with a minimum of environmental damage, both in the United States and elsewhere. Investigate the environmental policies and reputation of environmental companies before buying.
Pollution makes no distinction as to who it affects. However, there are indications that the burden of our collective pollution is unevenly carried. When our most vulnerable communities are protected, everyone benefits. If we start there, a healthier future is achievable for everyone.
Environmental policy and law
The environmental justice movement owes its momentum and effectiveness to the United States Constitution and three major pieces of legislation: Title VI 601; 602; and 42 U.S.C. 1983.
The Fourteenth Amendment and Equal Protection
Prior to the adoption of terms such as environmental justice or racist environment, residents of minority communities who believed they were victims of unfair environmental policies submitted 14th amendments to local municipalities seeking fair treatment. In Dowdell v. City of Apopka, 1983, discrimination was identified in the areas of street surfacing, water distribution, and stormwater drainage.
In United Farm Workers of Florida v. City of Delray Beach, 1974, city rights was established for the civil rights of agricultural workers. In Johnson v. City of Arcadia, 1978, the court found discrimination in access to cobbled streets, parks, and water supplies The Supreme Court decision in Washington v. Davis, 1976 announced the rule that intolerable discrimination under the Fourteenth Amendment requires an expression of intent, not just of dissimilar ones impact In Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Co., 1977, the Court determined a series of factors to determine whether infringing discrimination underlies an otherwise legitimate exercise of governmental authority.
Title VI, Civil Rights Act 601, 602, and 42 U.S.C. 198
Title VI, Civil Rights Act 601, states: No one in the United States will be excluded from participating in, denied benefits or discriminated against under any program or activity, by race, color, or national origin federal financial aid. (USC 1994) Title VI, Civil Rights Act 602 requires agencies that distribute federal funds to approve the regulations implementing Title VI Civil Rights Act and create an enforcement framework describing the way claims for discrimination are handled ( Shanahan, 403-406).
In addition to the two previous laws, environmental justice advocates also use 42 U.S.C. 1983 to establish that the impact of the agencies’ decision will have a negative impact on the community. 42 U.S.C. 1983 states:
Any person who, under the color of a statute, ordinance, ordinance, custom, or custom, of a state or territory or of the District of Columbia subjects, or has subjects subject to, subjects of the United States or other persons within the jurisdiction to deprive them of any rights, privileges or immunities guaranteed by the Constitution and laws are liable to the party injured in legal proceedings (USC 1983).
These legislative instruments favored the environmental justice movement until 2001, when the Supreme Court ruled in Alexander v. Sandoval that 602 do not provide an implied private right to take action to enforce disparate impact rules promoted by federal agencies in accordance with 602.
Thanks for reading about What is Environmental Justice? – Law, Regulations, and Policy